Compensatory Adaptation Theory: A Developmental Model of Psychological Disequilibrium to Adaptation, Maladaptation, and Adaptive-Appearing Maladaptation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35365/cjhs.26.2.03Keywords:
Compensatory adaptation, Compensatory adaptive response, Psychological imbalance, Adaptation motivation, Maladaptation, Adaptive-appearing maladaptationAbstract
Psychological imbalance and maladaptation are generally explained as the deterioration of an individual’s functioning in the face of stress, developmental vulnerability, or psychopathology. However, the individual is not merely a passive entity suffering from these processes, but is also part of an active system that strives to restore internal psychological balance. The Compensatory Adaptation Theory proposed in this article suggests that the subjective experience of psychological imbalance can trigger an adaptive motivation, which may lead to compensatory responses such as strengthening social relationships, working, seeking achievement, setting new goals, or self-improvement. According to the theory, the mere existence of compensatory responses does not necessarily indicate genuine adaptation. Depending on the quality, adequacy, and flexibility of the compensatory response, the process may take different paths. Flexible and functional responses in the individual can reduce psychological imbalance and create the opportunity for genuine adaptation. In contrast, inadequate and ineffective responses may result in persistent maladaptation, or if a response that was initially functional becomes the sole solution and self-worth is tied to this goal, it may also lead to the development of adaptive-appearing maladaptivity. In classical compensation approaches and in the selection-optimization-compensation model, responses are primarily sought to compensate for a specific loss or deficit. However, this theory focuses on the developmental trajectory of regulatory responses over time, which are shaped by psychological imbalances that may arise from various sources. Thus, by centering the active regulatory process in response to psychological imbalance, the Compensatory Adaptation Theory aims to explain how compensatory responses can evolve into genuine adaptation, persistent maladaptation, or adaptive-appearing maladaptivity.
References
Adler, A. (1927). Understanding human nature. Greenberg.
Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In P. B. Baltes & M. M. Baltes (Eds.), Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 1–34). Cambridge University Press.
Bonanno, G. A. (2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? American Psychologist, 59(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.20
Bonanno, G. A., Chen, S., & Galatzer-Levy, I. R. (2023). Resilience to potential trauma and adversity through regulatory flexibility. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2(11), 663–675. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00233-5
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174794
Cherry, K. M., Hoeven, E. V., Patterson, T. S., & Lumley, M. N. (2021). Defining and measuring “psychological flexibility”: A narrative scoping review of diverse flexibility and rigidity constructs and perspectives. Clinical Psychology Review, 84, 101973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2021.101973
Çakıcı, M. (2026). Developmental Layered Pathway Model: A new framework for gambling addiction [Conference presentation]. I. Symposium of Family Counselling, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Çakıcı, M. (2026a). Entrapment response framework: A conceptual framework explaining adaptive and maladaptive responses to psychological entrapment. European Archives of Social Sciences, e262013. https://doi.org/10.35365/eass.26.1.13
Çakıcı, M. (2026). Solution object differentiation theory: The process extending from entrapment to object solidification, transfer, and pathological Objectification. European Archives of Social Sciences, 3, e262012. https://doi.org/10.35365/eass.26.1.12
Çakıcı, M. (2026c). Adaptive-appearing maladaptation theory: Explaining psychopathology through its underlying mechanism rather than its behavioral appearance. Addiction Science Reviews, 1(2), 85–90. https://doi.org/10.35365/asr.26.2.01
Çakıcı, M. (2026d). Maladaptive ambition theory: A novel motivational model for the rigidification of solution-seeking in the development of addiction. Cyprus Turkish Journal of Psychiatry & Psychology, 1–10.
https://doi.org/10.35365/ctjpp.26.3.27
Cicchetti, D., & Rogosch, F. A. (1996). Equifinality and multifinality in developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 8(4), 597–600. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400007318
French, J. R. P., Rodgers, W., & Cobb, S. (1974). Adjustment as person-environment fit. In G. V. Coelho, D. A. Hamburg, & J. E. Adams (Eds.), Coping and adaptation (pp. 316–333). Basic Books.
Freund, A. M., & Baltes, P. B. (2002). Life-management strategies of selection, optimization, and compensation: Measurement by self-report and construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(4), 642–662. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.4.642
Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: Model, processes and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006
Heckhausen, J., & Schulz, R. (1995). A life-span theory of control. Psychological Review, 102(2), 284–304.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.284
Jacobson, N. S., Martell, C. R., & Dimidjian, S. (2001). Behavioral activation treatment for depression: Returning to contextual roots. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 8(3), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.8.3.255
Kandler, C., Kühn, S., Mönkediek, B., Forstner, A. J., & Bleidorn, W. (2024). A multidisciplinary perspective on person-environment fit: Relevance, measurement, and future directions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 33(3), 198–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214241242451
Kashdan, T. B., & Rottenberg, J. (2010). Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(7), 865–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.001
Kay, A. C., Whitson, J. A., Gaucher, D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Compensatory control: Achieving order through the mind, our institutions, and the heavens. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), 264–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01649.x
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.
Masten, A. S. (2014). Ordinary magic: Resilience in development. Guilford Press.
McCracken, L. M. (2024). Psychological flexibility, chronic pain, and health. Annual Review of Psychology, 75, 601–624. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020223-124335
Sroufe, L. A. (2005). Attachment and development: A prospective, longitudinal study from birth to adulthood. Attachment & Human Development, 7(4), 349–367.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14616730500365928
Sroufe, L. A., & Rutter, M. (1984). The domain of developmental psychopathology. Child Development, 55(1), 17–29.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1129832
Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 261–302). Academic Press.
Valentino, K., & Edler, K. (2024). The next generation of developmental psychopathology research: Including broader perspectives and becoming more precise. Development and Psychopathology, 36(5), 2104–2113. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579424000142
Vallerand, R. J., Blanchard, C., Mageau, G. A., Koestner, R., Ratelle, C., Léonard, M., Gagné, M., & Marsolais, J. (2003). Les passions de l'âme: On obsessive and harmonious passion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(4), 756–767. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.756
Wrosch, C., Scheier, M. F., Miller, G. E., Schulz, R., & Carver, C. S. (2003). Adaptive self-regulation of unattainable goals: Goal disengagement, goal reengagement, and subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(12), 1494–1508. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203256921
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mehmet Çakıcı

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.